Poker players have to have a lot of skills and be able to carry out different strategies, from poker mathematics to hand selection, which has shown us some of the most spectacular bluffs and victories in the history of the game. These are three of the greatest moments in poker that showcase the players' incredible ability to comprehend the subtle nuances of the game. If you would like a chance in going down in history with these legends, there are tonnes of casino offers online for you to look through.
The Best Bluff in History
Jack Strauss is well-known in the poker industry as being someone who loved action, particularly when playing poker. He was posthumously added to the Poker Hall of Fame in 1988 and had a reputation for playing aggressively. But the 1982 Poker World Series was one of Strauss' finest moments. He was dealt the "hammer" – a 7-2 suit – at the start of a game of No-Limit Hold'em but instead of folding immediately, he decided to make the best of the situation. After a player called, the flop produced a 7-3-3 to give Strauss a 2 pair.
As he waited for his opponent to make the next move, he leaned over and said "give me one of the $25 chips and you can see any one of my cards". After a pause, the opponent took Strauss up on his offer and flipped a card to reveal a two, leading him to think that Strauss had a Full House. He put down the hand, fooled into thinking that Strauss had a pair of twos, leading Strauss to achieve the greatest bluff of all time.
Pius Heinz – An Unlikely Champion
From the beginning, the odds were stacked against 22-year-old Pius Heinz in the World Series of Poker in 2011. Heinz outlasted 6,846 other players to reach the November Nine and returned to Las Vegas four months later to compete in the championship. Out of the players, Heinz had the seventh-lowest chip stack and eventually faced two players for the win – Marti Staszko and Ben Lamb. Heinz used his chips to achieve one of the most shocking comeback victories of all time, winning an astonishing $8,715,638 in prize money – the third-highest pay out in poker champion history.
Staszko and Heinz were left to battle it out, with Staszko beginning with a small chip lead. Over a six hour and 28-minute period, Heinz regained a chip lead on the ninth and final swap, building his chips to a 5 to 1 margin. Holding an A-K, Heinz called and since neither player made a pair – Staszko had a T-7 – the ace-high hand meant Heinz won the championship.
Moneymaker Makes Poker Mainstream
Chris Moneymaker's WSOP Main Event win is widely considered to be the moment when poker became a mainstream event. Moneymaker went against Sammy Farha in 2003 with $5.5 million chips to Farha's $2.9 million, with Ks-7h and Farha with Qs-9h for a top pair. Farha three $300,000 into the pot which Moneymaker raised to $800,000. Once Farha checked, Moneymaker shocked everyone by saying "I'm all in". Despite trying to get him to make a slip, Farha eventually folded, leaving Moneymaker with one of the most amazing bluffs of all time and a win of $1.8 million.
It's good to see that more and more attention is being paid to issues regarding toxicity in the workplace. At the same time, people have started to wise up to the problems related to gender differences and the extra divide that comes from that direction. There has been a lot of research on the topic too, and one particular trend has started to materialize lately: it's becoming more and more clear that some men in high positions of authority have a tendency to let that power go to their heads, and they subsequently end up undermining the performance of their entire operations and let their businesses run into red.
Toxicity at the Workplace Can Happen at All Levels
Toxic behavior is not limited to low-ranking employees, rather it is quite on the contrary. Research from the Harvard Business Review, has shown that men, of a CEO position, tend to be more prone to developing and displaying such behavior. There have been instances of overconfidence from higher-ups resulting in the ruin of entire organizations, as shown by the latest research from Company Rescue which tell us that UK SMEs with men on the board are more likely to go bust. So how do we resolve this issue?
It's Not an Easy Problem to Tackle
It's a very complicated problem to address in the first place because it spans across multiple areas of the organization and requires a good approach to all of them. It's important to have good communication with the company's leadership, ensure that there are adequate channels for voicing concerns, and even then, you'll still have to deal with the problem that overconfident people tend to have issues with being confronted in the first place.
Don't be surprised if your feedback falls on deaf ears – it's an expected part of doing this. Be prepared to take some harsh measures as well. If you realize that the company is beyond saving, talk to insolvency practitioners, such as Company Rescue, to ensure that you have a smooth exit. They can give expert advice to guide you through the process.
Identifying Problematic Patterns
It's a good idea for an organization to know how to identify these patterns before they turn detrimental. From doing this, the toxic behavior can be addressed at its root instead of letting it fester. Ensure that employees have some way of reporting issues on this front. For example, if women have a problem tied to gender imbalance. Whenever an issue is identified, make sure to act on it as fast as possible. In this scenario, perhaps hiring more women could help?
All in all, overconfidence in the workplace rarely leads to anything productive. Dealing with it requires a determined approach and you must be prepared to face some resistance along the way. To maximise your company's chance of survival in the long run, ensure to pay attention to these issues and resolve them as soon as possible.