#SWAAYthenarrative
BETA
Close

The 3 Greatest Moments in Poker Playing History

Poker players have to have a lot of skills and be able to carry out different strategies, from poker mathematics to hand selection, which has shown us some of the most spectacular bluffs and victories in the history of the game. These are three of the greatest moments in poker that showcase the players' incredible ability to comprehend the subtle nuances of the game. If you would like a chance in going down in history with these legends, there are tonnes of casino offers online for you to look through.


The Best Bluff in History

Jack Strauss is well-known in the poker industry as being someone who loved action, particularly when playing poker. He was posthumously added to the Poker Hall of Fame in 1988 and had a reputation for playing aggressively. But the 1982 Poker World Series was one of Strauss' finest moments. He was dealt the "hammer" – a 7-2 suit – at the start of a game of No-Limit Hold'em but instead of folding immediately, he decided to make the best of the situation. After a player called, the flop produced a 7-3-3 to give Strauss a 2 pair.

As he waited for his opponent to make the next move, he leaned over and said "give me one of the $25 chips and you can see any one of my cards". After a pause, the opponent took Strauss up on his offer and flipped a card to reveal a two, leading him to think that Strauss had a Full House. He put down the hand, fooled into thinking that Strauss had a pair of twos, leading Strauss to achieve the greatest bluff of all time.

Pius Heinz – An Unlikely Champion

From the beginning, the odds were stacked against 22-year-old Pius Heinz in the World Series of Poker in 2011. Heinz outlasted 6,846 other players to reach the November Nine and returned to Las Vegas four months later to compete in the championship. Out of the players, Heinz had the seventh-lowest chip stack and eventually faced two players for the win – Marti Staszko and Ben Lamb. Heinz used his chips to achieve one of the most shocking comeback victories of all time, winning an astonishing $8,715,638 in prize money – the third-highest pay out in poker champion history.

Staszko and Heinz were left to battle it out, with Staszko beginning with a small chip lead. Over a six hour and 28-minute period, Heinz regained a chip lead on the ninth and final swap, building his chips to a 5 to 1 margin. Holding an A-K, Heinz called and since neither player made a pair – Staszko had a T-7 – the ace-high hand meant Heinz won the championship.

Moneymaker Makes Poker Mainstream

Chris Moneymaker's WSOP Main Event win is widely considered to be the moment when poker became a mainstream event. Moneymaker went against Sammy Farha in 2003 with $5.5 million chips to Farha's $2.9 million, with Ks-7h and Farha with Qs-9h for a top pair. Farha three $300,000 into the pot which Moneymaker raised to $800,000. Once Farha checked, Moneymaker shocked everyone by saying "I'm all in". Despite trying to get him to make a slip, Farha eventually folded, leaving Moneymaker with one of the most amazing bluffs of all time and a win of $1.8 million.

Our newsletter that womansplains the week
4min read
Career

Please Don't Ask Me To Network

"Who are you meeting for lunch this week?"

Without fail, my former boss would ask me this question in every weekly status we had. And I dreaded the question. Because my answer was generally a stammering "Umm… No One." Occasionally I could remember what I actually had for lunch. And almost always it was sitting in my windowless cube eating a soggy sad sandwich.


I didn't understand why "who I had lunch with this week" was worthy of being a topic on our weekly status. After all, I was only 6 months into this new job. I was still figuring out how to pull data from Nielsen. I was still figuring out how to write an innovation brief. I was still trying to figure out where the bathrooms were in this maze of a building.

And despite knowing this question would come up in every weekly status, I was reluctant to change my behavior. I didn't see the value in the question. I didn't see the importance of it in my career. I didn't understand why I had to have lunch with anyone.

Because I hated the idea of having to network, to meet people, to put myself out there. Because networking was something slimy and strange and weird and scary. It made my stomach hurt, my throat go dry. And I could feel a faint headache coming on.

Even Oxford's definition of networking only reaffirmed my fears of what networking looked like: the action or process of interacting with others to exchange information and develop professional or social contacts.

Because please don't ask me to walk into a room where I don't know anyone. And stand in the corner sipping a bad glass of Chardonnay. Please don't ask me to slide my business card out and not so subtly shove it in your face. And ask you to do something for me. Please don't ask me to network. Because I hate networking.

And I used to hate networking (okay, maybe hate is too strong.) I still really dislike the term. "Networking" seemed about getting something from someone. Or someone getting something from you. A favor, a job, a referral. "Networking" seemed very transactional. And someone shoving a business card at you (which happened to me recently at event) only solidified by feelings.

And over the years, I came to really understand that networking wasn't about "the action or process of interacting with others." It was about building authentic connections. It was about meeting people who were different than you. It was about expanding my community. And creating new communities. It was tapping into more and more communities I could belong to.

And as I slowly started to change my view on networking- I mean building authentic connections- I started to realize my communities were more inclusive than I thought. My best friends from middle school. Former bosses. College Alumni I met after we had graduated. Colleagues from past companies. Vendors and agency partners I had once worked with. Colleagues I had once managed. As my family expanded, my husband, my two sister-in laws and my brother in-law. A whole host of fabulous cousin-in-laws. My baby brother as his career skyrocketed. And fellow parents in my kids' school.

I still hate networking. And I love building connections. And helping to build connections and be a bridge for other people.

Now, when I go to a large event, I try to go with a friend. We have a drink at the bar and then part ways to try and make new friends. If we don't authentically connect with other people, and we have made the effort, we always have each other to back to.

Now, I try to meet one new person a week at my company or in my broader community, or reconnect with someone I miss seeing. (This doesn't always have to be in person, can be text, Zoom or Facetime.) And if you can't commit to doing that, that you should seriously relook at your schedule. I thank my former boss for that constant reminder.

Now, I joined Luminary, a women's collaboration hub in NYC, which has been life changing for me. I am also on the advisory board. It's all about women supporting and lifting each other up- to get more money, get that next big promotion, or start their own venture. It's a built-in community of unwavering support.

Now, I am working on expanding my community of moms. Not too long ago, I worked up the nerve to ask a fellow mom in my daughter's class if she wanted to get together. She thought I meant a playdate. I meant drinks. And after one late night out drinking, I have bonded with a whole new set of badass women.

And all of these communities. I am there for my communities. And they are all there for me. Referral for a job at my company. Coaching on how to survive a bad boss. Advice on how to ask for more money. Supporting each other as we care for aging parents. Candid feedback on why they didn't get that promotion. Commiserating over a cocktail on which working parent had the worst week ever.

So please don't ask me to network. Because I hate it. And well actually I don't have a business card to give you. I haven't printed one in four years.